Remembering That Time We Dug Into William Garretson and the Manson Murders
The Manson Family murders at 10050 Cielo Drive continue to fascinate and
horrify, decades after the gruesome events took place. Tonight, we're diving
deep into the testimony of William Garretson, a key witness whose account has
been plagued by inconsistencies and lingering suspicions. I did a live stream where
I read out his trial testimony Click Here to see it. The resulting discussion
took us on quite a journey.
Garretson was employed as a houseboy by Rudi Altobelli, the owner of the
property. His duties involved caring for Altobelli's dogs while he was away in
Europe and maintaining the guest house. On the fateful night of August 9th,
1969, Stephen Parent visited Garretson at midnight, apparently to sell him a
clock radio. Parent's departure from the Guest House would be his last, as he
was the first victim of the Manson Family that night.
Garretson claims to have heard nothing amiss, a statement that has been met
with widespread disbelief. He maintained he remained in the guest house the
entire night, listening to music and writing letters, oblivious to the horrific
events unfolding just a short distance away. The skepticism surrounding his
testimony stems from several factors:
Suspicious Silence
How could
someone remain unaware of such brutal violence happening so close by? Many
believe Garretson was either deliberately lying out of fear for his own safety,
or perhaps even fled the scene during the commotion and returned later.
The Cary Grant Rumors
A persistent rumor alleging actor Cary Grant's presence at the guest house that night has recently resurfaced. The whispered
narrative suggests a possible homosexual liaison between Grant and Garretson,
leading them to flee the property together down the fire trails before Grant
returned later to move his car and cover his tracks. These claims are said to
have been made by Cary Grant's manager and contribute to the overall air of
mystery surrounding Garretson.
Conflicting Accounts: Sebring's Presence
Garretson testified he had seen one of the victims,
Jay Sebring’s car, at the Polanski residence regularly. This statement
conflicts with other accounts, particularly those of witness Winifred Chapman, the
maid, who claimed Sebring was not a regular guest, adding to the confusion
surrounding what was really happening at Cielo Drive.
Key Details from Garretson's Testimony
Open Door
Garretson surprisingly claimed he kept a back door to
the guest house open the entire time, to allow the dogs to get in and out. This
means Patricia Krenwinkel should have easily been able to gain entry when she
was sent to check the guest house, adding more mystery to how Garretson
survived the brutal massacre that night.
The Barking Dog
He stated that Altobelli's dog Christopher went
outside around 2:00 a.m., barked, and then returned inside. This seemingly
innocuous detail raises further questions: why wouldn't a dog bark more
intensely during a violent attack nearby?
Music and Mood
He said he was
listening to The Doors and Mama Cass, specifically that Mama Cass was playing
on the record player that night.
A 'House Boy Mafia'?
Garretson's reluctance to admit seemingly simple facts, like whether it was a hot night (he claimed he never opened the windows despite the heat), only deepens the suspicion surrounding him, and makes him seem evasive, adding another layer of complexity to the case.
Interestingly, Garretson's role as a 'houseboy' is not unique in this narrative. The presence of several young men employed in similar capacities, from Harrigan and Doyle's houseboy Terrence Cookesly mentioned in the homicide report I did a live stream about, to Rudi Altobelli. Even Tex Watson, seemingly living at Dennis Wilson's place in a similar role, it seems to be a recurring theme in this case, which has led to speculation about a network, a 'houseboy Mafia.' The theory suggests these individuals might have been intertwined in ways that are still not fully understood.
While William Garretson was ultimately cleared of any direct involvement in the murders, his testimony remains a source of intrigue and debate. His evasiveness, the persistent rumors, and the conflicting details surrounding his account continue to fuel speculation about what he truly knew, and what he might still be hiding. The case of William Garretson serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and lingering mysteries that continue to surround the Manson Family saga.
Altobelli's Evasive Maneuvers
Rudi Altobelli, the property owner, played a significant role in the narrative surrounding Garretson. In a previously analyzed video posted by Tom O’Neill, author of “Chaos” of interviews with Altobelli, he can be heard being remarkably evasive when questioned about how Garretson and he initially met. This hesitation and reluctance to provide a clear answer further muddies the waters. Why was Altobelli so uncomfortable discussing this seemingly innocuous detail? His evasiveness only fuels speculation and reinforces the feeling that information was being withheld or manipulated.
The case surrounding the Tate-LaBianca murders is a complex tapestry woven with tragedy, speculation, and unanswered questions. Examining the details, especially Garretson's testimony, reveals inconsistencies and raises doubts about the official narrative. The open back door, the bizarre midnight radio sale, and Altobelli's evasiveness all point to a story that is far from fully resolved. As we continue to revisit and analyze the evidence, we owe it to the victims to pursue the truth, no matter how uncomfortable or unsettling it may be.
Comments
Post a Comment